ANALYSIS OF NON PERFORMING ASSETS IN BANKS - 600 Words

Type of Research †¢ This project â€Å"ANALYSIS OF NON PERFORMING ASSETS IN BANKS† is considered as an exploratory research. Exploratory research is basically a secondary research that started with a search for articles, research papers and books that explained the basics of the topic. †¢ In this project I have used secondary data by studying various articles, magazines, research papers and books that explain the basis of the topic. †¢ I have visited a bank where I had an informal discussion with the employees and I was provided with the relevant information by him. †¢ Further, the Internet allowed for research methods that were more interactive in nature. This helped me to save the time and efforts to collect the data. †¢ I visited RBI site†¦show more content†¦In the above graph IDBI Bank and Axis Bank show a decline in Gross NPA over the 2 years of time but IDBI Bank (Public Sector Bank) has greater Gross NPA as compared to Axis Bank (Private Sector Bank). Hence IDBI Bank has low credit portfolio as compared to Axis Bank. COMPARISION OF NET NPAS OF TWO BANKS. INTERPRETATION:- High Net NPA indicates the high quantity of risky assets in the Banks for which noprovision are made.. In the above graph IDBI Bank and Axis Bank show a decline in Net NPA over the 2 years of time but IDBI Bank (Public Sector Bank) has greater Net NPA as compared to Axis Bank (Private Sector Bank). Hence IDBI Bank has high quality of risky asset . Findings †¢ The reduction in loan installment to 90 days may raise the NPA levels in the short run. †¢ Private Banks have more efficient management of NPAs as compared to Public sectors as gross NPAs of Public sectors Banks are 51537 and whereas private sector Banks are 5771.17. Thus †¢ IDBI bank has higher Gross NPA than Axis Bank as gross NPAs of IDBI in 2010 is 2784.73 and in 2011 is 2129.38 whereas gross NPA of Axis Bank in 2010 is 2393.42 and in 2011 is 2275.3. †¢ Net NPAs of IDBI in 2010 is 1677.91 and in 2011 is 1589.2 whereas Net NPA of Axis Bank in 2010 is 704.13 and in 2011 is 678.70. This shows IDBI bank has higher Net NPA then Axis Bank which means IDBI Bank has high quantity of risky assets for which noprovision are made. †¢ Public

Analysis Of Sophocles Antigone And David Hares - 1314 Words

In both Sophocles’ play Antigone and David Hares’ drama Page Eight the plots center on politics and personal identity. The ideas of personal identity and politics are, however, presented in very distinct manners. In Antigone, Sophocles portrays politics and personal identity in a nullifying manner as they lead to death and there is no happy ending. Hares, on the other hand, presents politics and personal identity in a more constructing manner as there is no tragic deaths and there is more of a pleasant ending. In Antigone, politics are portrayed in a nullifying manner due to the tragic events that follow the decisions of the ruler. The political plot is set early in the play as the story is unveiled. Creon, as presented in the ‘Persons†¦show more content†¦(Pg. 9) This at the time, as according to the ‘Notes’ page of the book, was a â€Å"terrible punishment, striking at the most elemental Greek feeling concerning the proper treatment of the dead...† Once Antigone learns about this she insist on burying her brother even if this means defying the law. (Pg. 2-4) Antigone goes through with her plan; she, however, is caught doing so and taken in to Creon’s custody and sentenced to be sent away to a ‘deep catacomb’ in which she is expected to eventually die. (Pg. 15-16 and 33) Politics are brought up once again when Hà ¦mon, Creon’s son and Antigone’s fiancà ©, confronts his father. When Hà ¦mon first faces his father he m entions that he is only there to give advice to him since he is his son and he believes that it is his duty to inform him about what the people of Thebes are talking about. (Pg. 26-27) However, Creon misinterprets this and goes on to say that Hà ¦mon is fighting on a woman’s side. (Pg. 28) Politics play a role in this scene because Hà ¦mon simply served as the voice of the people of Thebes and because it shows that women were threated and viewed as lesser individuals. In the end, Creon’s decisions as the ruler backfire as Antigone, Hà ¦mon, and his wife, Eurydice, wind up being dead due to his actions. If Creon had never placed the proclamation of not burying Polynices, then many deaths could have been saved. The personal identity in Antigone

Victor Frankenstein’s Free Essays

As I walked through the huge cold rusty door of Frankenstein’s workshop, my nostrils suddenly burned with the disgustingly smell of decaying flesh and dried blood, but still I carried on my journey threw the cold workshop. I looked up and there were broken electrical cables running right to the center of the workshop. Every couple of seconds they gave out a sudden spark of electricity. We will write a custom essay sample on Victor Frankenstein’s or any similar topic only for you Order Now Whilst I was wondering what they were being used for, I walked further in to the workshop and I tripped over a blood covered sheet I panicked and kicked the sheet of me, and jumped back to my feet. I couldn’t figure out what the electrical cables were being used for so I decided to follow them deeper in to the workshop. Along my path, I walked across broken bottles and tubes all with their contents covering the floor, and their were more of undamaged ones stacked up high on shelves, filled with their own custom colors and distinctive smells. I finally came to be the cables were linked up to, it seemed to be a giant copper tank filled with discolored water, and chunks of bone and flesh, which smelled like rotten egg. It had steam slowly escaping from the poorly welded seems of the tank, I looked behind the tank to discover another one, This one had dark green water in it and was glass, completely opposite to the copper tank, I decided to take a look. The tank was filled with dead electric ells, which had been obviously there for a while, as they were decaying. I heard loud scratching noise coming from a door in the workshop, I slowly wondered towards it,and give it a small push open, when suddenly two or three rats came scurrying out of it, they ran off somewhere behind the tank, I mainly focused what was in the room, their was a window in the corner letting rain threw its hole in the glass, it hadn’t been cleaned by the looks of things since it had been installed as it was covered in years of dust and grime. I walked into the room to see what lied on the table that laid in the middle of room, the table was covered with books, one book laid open reading â€Å"Life after death†. At the other side of the table were two dissected frogs, one of them laid lifelessly with a big gash running down its back, and the other one had small wires attached to its hands and feet, I knocked a book to the floor I bent down to pick it up, and I saw a key I picked both the key and book up, I read the book cover which read â€Å"bringing back the dead† and I put it back on the table, I saw another door next to an old bookshelf, I tried to open it but it was locked. I looked at the key and tried it in the lock it worked, and I opened the door. I jumped back in fear as the door lead to a closet containing human body parts and organs I quickly slammed the door shut and ran to the other side of the room. I vomited, I panicked and ran out the room back to the main part of the workshop, to again smell decaying flesh, I ignored the smell this time and I continued running back to the entrance following the electrical cables which lead me into the workshop, I reached the rusty door and pushed it open to let me free in to the rain outside and to take a much needed fresh breath of air. How to cite Victor Frankenstein’s, Papers

Business Law Consolidated Business Acts

Question: Discuss about the Business Law for Consolidated Business Acts. Answer: 1. In the present case, Dodgy Pty Ltd was the owner of caf and he was to sell this caf to Bill and Jill. He stated certain facts about regarding the business which led Bill and Jill into entering the sale contract. Here, we analyze the laws of business that can help Bill and Jill. As per section 19 of the Minors (Property and Contracts) Act, 1970, when a minor contributes in a civil act and at the time of such contribution by minor, the civil act was carried is for the benefit of such minor, then such act is binding on the minor. Section 8 of this act defines that an individual who is under the age of 18 years, is a minor (Australasian Legal Information Institute, 2016). Through various sections of this act and the common laws, a minor is held as eligible to enter into a contract regarding sale or purchase of property and regarding provisions of service and employment. When a sale of a business takes place in NSW, the Property, Stocks and Business Agents Regulations, 2014 are applicable on such business (NSW legislation, 2016). As per the Australian Contract Law, when a contract is made between two parties and one party misrepresents the facts of the dealing, than it is the case of misrepresentation. This phenomenon was established in various cases including the case of Bisset v Wilkinson [1927] AC 177, Smith v Land House Property Corp (1884) 28 Ch D 7 and Edgington v Fitzmaurice (1885) 29 Ch D 459. Moreover, when the facts have been falsified with the aim of getting the non breaching party to enter into the contract, it is it case of misrepresentation as was seen in the case of Museprime Properties v Adhill Properties [1990] 36 EG 114. Further cases like, Horsfall v Thomas [1862] 1 HC 90 and Redgrave v Hurd (1881) 20 Ch D 1 establish when misrepresentation had induced the other party to enter into the contract (LawTeacher, 2016). Such misrepresentation results in a breach of contract and remedies in form of damages are available with the aggrieved party (Andrews, 2015). Here, Bill is a minor and entered into a contract, along with his sister Jill, for purchase of a cafe. This contract was legal and enforceable as the legislatures of NSW consider a contract by a minor as legal and binding. This has been established in the case of Nash v Inman [1908] 2 KB 1 (Australian Contract Law, 2010). The cases like McLaughlin v Darcy (1918) 18 SR (NSW) 585 and Chaplin v Leslie Frewin (Publishers) Ltd [1966] Ch 71 further affirm the position that minors can enter into enforceable contracts. Further, this contract was for the benefit of Bill and so legally enforceable. In case of Homestake Gold of Australia Ltd v Peninsula Gold Pty Ltd [1996] NSWSC 116, the benefit was not established and so the minor was not held liable (Latimer, 2012). Upon running the business, Bill and Jill found that the facts stated by Dodgy Pty. Ltd. were false and a misrepresentation was made in this case (Fair Trading, 2016). Also, a misleading and deceptive conduct under Trade Practices Act is also present in this, as established in the case of Yorke v Lucas (1985) 158 CLR 661. To conclude, Bill and Jill are liable to monetary damages as provided in Civil Liability Act 2002 (Australasian Legal Information Institute, 2016). Further, this misrepresentation gives Bill and Jill the power to terminate the contract as misrepresentation makes a contract voidable at the instance of aggrieved party. 2. In the present case, Hugh had falsely certain facts. Through the various applicable laws, an understanding has been drawn regarding the legal actions and remedies available to the aggrieved party. Any food industry in the region of New South Wales has to follow the provisions of the Food Act 2003 (NSW), Food Regulation 2015 and Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code (FSANZ). The objects of Food Act 2003 (NSW) comprise the following: to make certain that the food for sale is secure and suitable for consumption of humans; to prevent any deceptive demeanor in relation to sale of food; and lastly, to present the application of the Food Standards Code. The Food Regulation 2015 contains various regulations to ensure that the objectives of the Act are met with (NSW legislation, 2016). The standards established in the FSANZ are legislative instruments under the Legislation Act 2003. The objectives of FSANZ are same as that of the Act (Food Standards, 2016). Further, there are legislations that are relevant to food and promotion and packaging which are enforced by various bureaus. These include the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cwlth) which is enforced by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission; the Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW) enforceable by the NSW Fair Trading; and lastly, the weights and measures are enforced by the National Measurement Institute (Department of Primary Industries Food Authority, 2016). The Australian Consumer Law deals with the unfair practices including deceptive or misleading conduct, unfair contracts and unconscionable conduct, product safety and information, product liability (Coorey, 2015). Section 18 of ACL prohibits such conduct by businesses which is deceptive or misleading or is likely to result in deception or misleads the consumer (Corones, 2011). The Fair Trading Act 1987 contains similar provisions with regards to misleading and deceptive conduct of businesses. The provisions of these acts have the objective of consumer protection so that the businesses are prevented from harming the consumer. Remedies under these acts include fines and damages. If a consumer has suffered damage or a loss due to deceptive or misleading conduct by a business, then such a consumer is entitled to damages in the form of monetary compensation. Here, Hugh falsely advertised that they were using UberPizzaDelivery when he was using his sons services and not of UberPizzaDelivery. So, Hugh was misleading his customers. To draw this analysis a reference has to be made to cases like Dib Group Pty Ltd v Ventouris Enterprises Pty Ltd [2011] NSWCA 300 (21 September 2011) and Beach Petroleum Nl and Claremont Petroleum Nl v Malcolm Keith Johnson and Others [1993] FCA 283; (1993) 115 ALR 411 (1993) 11 ACSR 103 (1993) 43 FC (10 June 1993) which are leading cases in misleading and deceptive conduct of a business. Also, Hugh falsely advertised that in his business only fresh ingredients are used, whereas, in reality, he was using old and out of date cheeses in his pizzas. Here, deception can be clearly established on the basis of famous case laws including Australian Competition and Consumer Commission vDukemasterPty Ltd (ACN 050 275 226) [2009] FCA 682 (24 June 2009); Caffey -v- Leatthayter [No 3] [2013] WASC 348 (18 October 2013). This was also established in the case of Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Limited [2014] FCA 634 (Burrows, 2014). As per the Food Act 2003 (NSW) and FSANZ code, a business had to use fresh ingredients which are safe for human consumption. The definition of food (Section 6), unsafe food (Section 8) and unsuitable food (Section 9) has been clearly given in the Food Act (NSW legislation, 2016). The out of date cheese used by Hugh falls under the category of unsuitable food as cheese is a perishable substance as it was used after its reasonable intended use. Section 15 of the Food Act states the penalties when the description of given food is false. The penalties stated in Section 15 are applicable to Hugh as he knew that the cheese was falsely described and that it could result in physical harm. In the case of Bradshaw v McEwans Pty Ltd (1951) 217 ALR 1 at 5, it was stated that to differentiation in criminal and civil proceedings, the facts have to be such so as to eliminate rational hypothesis consistent with innocence. In civil proceedings only plausible inference in favor of what is alleged has to be made. Presently, where direct proof is not available, it is enough if the circumstances appearing in evidence give rise to a reasonable and definite inference. Here, Hugh would not be liable for criminal proceedings as there is no direct proof to the fact that he actually knew someone could die. These principles were also applied in the recent case of Samaan bht Samaan v Kentucky Fried Chicken Pty Ltd[2012] NSWSC 381 (White and Latta, 2015). In the given case, eating such unsafe pizza caused sickness amongst various customers and even resulted in the death of one customer. These parties, along with the heir of the dead person can sue Hugh for serious offence committed by Hugh. Division 1 of the Food Act through its sections states the penalties in form of penalty units and imprisonment. It is up to the discretion of the court to award the necessary penalty in this case. Hugh misled the consumers by stating that they were still using services of UberEats. This gives UberEats the right to sue Hugh for misrepresentation. The contract of service between UberEats and Hugh ended when Hugh started using his son delivery. The name of a business can only be used by the other party if a license in this regard has been provided by the owner of business name. Further, the competition and consumer act prohibits a business from misusing the name of other business as it misleads customers and is deceptive in nature. So, UberEats can sue Hugh for the irreparable damages caused to their business. So it can be concluded that, the conduct was deceptive and misleading and led to infringement of the Australian Consumer Law and other relevant laws. And since, such damage or loss was caused by the conduct than the court may award compensatory order or injunction or orders for corrective advertising to UberEats and sick parties along with heir of the dead person. References Andrews, N. (2015) Contract Law.2nd ed. UK: Cambridge University Press Australasian Legal Information Institute (2016) New South Wales Consolidated Acts: Civil Liability Act 2002. [Online] Australasian Legal Information Institute. Available from: https://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/nsw/consol_act/cla2002161/ [Accessed on 06/09/16] Australasian Legal Information Institute (2016) New South Wales Consolidated Acts: Minors (Property And Contracts) Act 1970. [Online] Australasian Legal Information Institute. Available from: https://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/nsw/consol_act/cla2002161/ [Accessed on 06/09/16] Australian Contract Law (2010) Nash v Inman [1908] 2 KB 1. [Online] Australian Contract Law. Available from: https://www.australiancontractlaw.com/cases/nash.html [Accessed on 06/09/16] Burrows, M. (2014) Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Limited [2014] FCA 634. [Online] Dundas Lawyers. Available from: https://www.dundaslawyers.com.au/australian-competition-and-consumer-commission-v-coles-supermarkets-australia-pty-limited-2014/ [Accessed on 06/09/16] Coorey, A. (2015) Australian Consumer Law. Australia: LexisNexis Butterworths. Corones, S.G. (2011) The Australian Consumer Law. Rozelle, NSW: Thomson Reuters (Professional) Australia. Department of Primary Industries Food Authority (2016) Property, Stock and Business Agents Regulation 2014. [Online] New South Wales Government. Available from: https://www.foodauthority.nsw.gov.au/ip/legislation [Accessed on 06/09/16] Fair Trading (2016) Misrepresentation guidelines. [Online] New South Wales Government. Available from: https://www.fairtrading.nsw.gov.au/ftw/Property_agents_and_managers/Agency_responsibilities/Misrepresentation_guidelines.page [Accessed on 06/09/16] Food Standards (2016) Food Standards Code. [Online] Government of Australia. Available from: https://www.foodstandards.gov.au/code/Pages/default.aspx [Accessed on 06/09/16] Latimer, P. (2012) Australian Business Law 2012. 31st ed. NSW: CCH Australia Limited, pp 358-361 LawTeacher (2016) Contract Law Misrepresentation Cases. [Online] LawTeacher. Available from: https://www.lawteacher.net/cases/contract-law/misrepresentation-cases.php [Accessed on 06/09/16] NSW legislation (2016) Food Act 2003. [Online] New South Wales Government. Available from: https://www.legislation.nsw.gov.au/#/view/act/2003/43 [Accessed on 06/09/16] NSW legislation (2016) Food Regulation 2005. [Online] New South Wales Government. Available from: https://www.legislation.nsw.gov.au/#/view/regulation/2015/622 [Accessed on 06/09/16] NSW legislation (2016) Property, Stock and Business Agents Regulation 2014. [Online] New South Wales Government. Available from: https://www.legislation.nsw.gov.au/#/view/regulation/2014/563/full [Accessed on 06/09/16] White, S., and Latta, M. (2015) A guide to food poisoning claims. [Online] Carter Newell Lawyers. Available from: https://www.carternewell.com/page/Publications/2015/A_guide_to_food_poisoning_claims/ [Accessed on 06/09/16]